![]() |
| Embellishments Contents |
|
Alfonso Fontanelli: The Complete MadrigalsEdited by Anthony Newcomb
Einstein, in The Italian Madrigal, called Fontanelli “Gesualdo’s harmonious and well-balanced counterpart” and “perhaps more gifted” than any of the noblemen-composers of madrigals at the end of the centurythat number includes Striggio, Gesualdo, and Del Turco. Unlike Gesualdo, however, Fontanelli was conflicted about exercising his musical gifts, worrying that it was an unseemly activity for a nobleman, and he seems to have renounced even anonymous publication once his career as a courtier and statesman was well-established. In any case, no compositions of his are known to survive from later than the Second Book of 1604, although he died in 1622. This edition will include Fontanelli’s two anonymously published madrigal books (1595 and 1604), plus an anonymous manuscript anthology (ca. 1590) attributed by me to Fontanelli, on the basis of one concordant attribution, a series of letters by Fontanelli, and the choice of text set. I have aimed with particular diligence to assess the style of all the texts set by Fontanelli and to trace the provenance and authorship of these texts, many of which Fontanelli was the first to set. For each piece, texts, attributions of the text, if known, with sources, translations of the texts, and commentary on text and setting are provided. The commentaries on the individual pieces, sometimes fairly extended, often discuss other settings of the same or closely related texts, especially where the relations with Fontanelli’s setting can illuminate elements of his distinctive style. Where modern editions of the comparison pieces are not generally available, editions of the pieces discussed are provided in the appendix to each volume. These appendices will include pieces by Ruggiero Giovannelli, Sigismondo d’India, Giovanni Maria Nanino, Antonio Cifra, Giovan Domenico Montella, Pomponio Nenna, Scipione Dentice, Giovanni Andrea Dragoni, Marc’ Antonio Ingegneri, and Filippo de Monte.
In the process of working on both these editions, I have consulted one example at least of every printing of the madrigal books by these two composers, in search of variants, paste-on corrections, and handwritten emendations. In the case of Luzzaschi, I have looked at every surviving partbook. With Fontanelli, I have also been able to look at a fair selection of his letters, since a goodly number of them, both personal and official, survive. His personal letters reveal an urbane, mildly cynical, highly sophisticated, often ironically humorous character, and a figure in the thick of the musical politics of the time. A similar style of elegant, sophisticated understatement marks the madrigals as well. Fontanelli’s musical style is closest to Gesualdo’s in their publications of 1595 and 1596, but it is always more distanced, more restrained in expression, more decorous, less self-important. In Fontanelli’s Second Book of 1604, the interaction seems to be more with a Florentine and Roman group of composers also publishing at the time (Caccini, Dentice, Nenna). It may also show an attempt to bring his ideal of the polyphonic madrigal into some accommodation with the trend towards accompanied monody.
Fontanelli’s madrigals are not as fiendishly difficult to sing as
Gesualdo’s, and they allow their texts to speak with a quick directness
that recalls the songs of Hugo Wolf. They should offer many a quintet of
singers both professional and amateur a skillful and effective
repertoire of vocal chamber music.♦ Anthony Newcomb is professor of musicology at the University of California, Berkeley. His research includes Italian madrigals and instrumental music (15401640), nineteenth-century music, musical aesthetics and criticism, and the music of Wagner. His publications include The Madrigal in Ferrara, 157997; Complete Works of Luzzasco Luzzasschi (editor), and various articles in Early Music, JAMS, 19th-Century Music (“The Birth of Music out of the Spirit of Drama”), Studi Musicali, Rivista Italiana di Musicologia, Annales Musicologiques, Critical Inquiry and other journals. |